RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.2% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (48 GB vs 16 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile.
| Insight | RTX 6000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 6000 Ada Generation remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 6000 Ada Generation and GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,454 points. Launch price was $6,799.
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1335 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,048 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX 6000 Ada Generation scores 28,454 versus the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile's 27,048 — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation leads by 5.2%. The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 18,176 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs 9,728 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Raw compute: 91.06 TFLOPS (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs 32.98 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Boost clocks: 2505 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 142 RT cores (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs 76 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) with 568 Tensor cores vs 304.
| Feature | RTX 6000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 28,454+5% | 27,048 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 18176+87% | 9728 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 91.06 TFLOPS+176% | 32.98 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2505 MHz+48% | 1695 MHz |
| ROPs | 192+71% | 112 |
| TMUs | 568+87% | 304 |
| L1 Cache | 17.8 MB+87% | 9.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+50% | 64 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 142+87% | 76 |
| Tensor Cores | 568+87% | 304 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 6000 Ada Generation lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RTX 6000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 6000 Ada Generation comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile has 16 GB. The RTX 6000 Ada Generation offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 960 GB/s (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs 576 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) — a 66.7% advantage for the RTX 6000 Ada Generation. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 96 MB (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs 64 MB (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 6000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+200% | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 960 GB/s+67% | 576 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+50% | 64 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | RTX 6000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile).
| Feature | RTX 6000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th Gen | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 6000 Ada Generation draws 300W versus the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile's 120W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Power connectors: 16-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 6000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 120W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 94.8 | 225.4+138% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | RTX 6000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6799 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5500 | — |
| Codename | AD102 | AD103 |
| Release | December 3 2022 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #24 | #30 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 6000 Ada Generation and GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
