Ryzen 3 2200GE vs Xeon E3-1225 v2

Ryzen 3 2200GE vs Xeon E3-1225 v2 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 2200GE

4 / 4

5,933

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E3-1225 v2

4 / 4

6,015

+1.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 2200GE vs Xeon E3-1225 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 2200GE vs Xeon E3-1225 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 2200GE

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 77W, a 42W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,933 vs 6,015).
❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1225 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E3-1225 v2

2012

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌120% higher power demand at 77W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1225 v2 better than Ryzen 3 2200GE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1225 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 2200GE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E3-1225 v2 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1225 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1225 v2 is still the better call for a fresh build. Xeon E3-1225 v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 3 2200GE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 5,933 PassMark with 4 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 2200GE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 3 2200GE vs Xeon E3-1225 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 2200GE

The Ryzen 3 2200GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 5,933 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1225 v2

The Xeon E3-1225 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Passmark benchmark score: 6,015 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 2200GE is built on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 2200GE scores 5,933 against the Xeon E3-1225 v2's 6,015 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon E3-1225 v2.

Feature	Ryzen 3 2200GE	Xeon E3-1225 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	—
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	—
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	—
Architecture	Raven Ridge (2017−2019)	—
PassMark	5,933	6,015+1%