Ryzen 3 2200U
VS
Core i7-2635QM

Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i7-2635QM

AMD

Ryzen 3 2200U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Core i7-2635QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Ryzen 3 2200U is positioned at rank 154 and the Core i7-2635QM is on rank 1096, so the Ryzen 3 2200U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 3 2200U

#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
98%
#142
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
328%
#143
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
323%
#144
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
296%
#145
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
295%
#146
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
292%
#148
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
282%
#149
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
271%
#150
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
270%
#151
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
263%
#154
Ryzen 3 2200U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#158
Core i5-3210M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2635QM

#1084
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3131%
#1085
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3085%
#1086
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2832%
#1087
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2820%
#1088
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2794%
#1090
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2698%
#1091
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2587%
#1092
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2583%
#1093
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2513%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
100%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1101
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1102
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
98%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
96%
#1106
Core i5-2430M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1108
Pentium Dual Core T4500
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
95%
#1109
Celeron B820
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
95%
#1110
Pentium B980
MSRP: $125|Avg: $35
94%
#1111
Celeron 867
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 3 2200U (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Dual-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightRyzen 3 2200UCore i7-2635QM
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raven Ridge (2017−2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-2635QM (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightRyzen 3 2200UCore i7-2635QM
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 2200U and Core i7-2635QM

AMD

Ryzen 3 2200U

The Ryzen 3 2200U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,583 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i7-2635QM

The Core i7-2635QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1224. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,541 points. Launch price was $378.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 2200U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-2635QM offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-2635QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 2200U versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i7-2635QM — a 15.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 2200U (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 3 2200U uses the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-2635QM uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 2200U scores 3,583 against the Core i7-2635QM's 3,541 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen 3 2200U. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 2200U vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2635QM.

FeatureRyzen 3 2200UCore i7-2635QM
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+17%
2.9 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+25%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)+100%
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
3,583+1%
3,541
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 2200U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2635QM uses FCBGA1224 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 3 2200UCore i7-2635QM
Socket
FP5
FCBGA1224
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 3 2200U) / VT-x (Core i7-2635QM). The Core i7-2635QM includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Ryzen 3 2200U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2635QM targets Mobile.

FeatureRyzen 3 2200UCore i7-2635QM
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Mobile