Ryzen 3 2200U vs Xeon E5620

Ryzen 3 2200U vs Xeon E5620 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 2200U

2 / 4

3,583

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E5620

4 / 8

3,621

+1.1%

Pentium Dual Core T3400

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 2200U vs Xeon E5620 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 2200U vs Xeon E5620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 2200U

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 80W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5620 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,583 vs 3,621).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5620, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon E5620

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌433.3% higher power demand at 80W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5620 better than Ryzen 3 2200U?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5620 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 2200U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5620 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5620 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5620 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5620 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 2200U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 3 2200U vs Xeon E5620 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 2200U

The Ryzen 3 2200U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,583 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon E5620

The Xeon E5620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,621 points. Launch price was $35.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 2200U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5620 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5620 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 2200U versus 2.66 GHz on the Xeon E5620 — a 24.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 2200U (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 3 2200U uses the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5620 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 2200U scores 3,583 against the Xeon E5620's 3,621 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon E5620. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 2200U vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E5620.

Feature	Ryzen 3 2200U	Xeon E5620
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+28%	2.66 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+4%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+200%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Raven Ridge (2017−2019)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	3,583	3,621+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 2200U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5620 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.