PRO A10-8770 vs Ryzen 3 2200U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

PRO A10-8770 vs Ryzen 3 2200U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

PRO A10-8770 vs Ryzen 3 2200U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

PRO A10-8770

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,547 vs 3,583).
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Ryzen 3 2200U

2018

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than PRO A10-8770 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 2200U better than PRO A10-8770?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, PRO A10-8770 is ahead with a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 2200U pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 2200U is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 2200U still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 3 2200U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 2200U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

PRO A10-8770 vs Ryzen 3 2200U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

PRO A10-8770

The PRO A10-8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,547 points. Launch price was $69.

Ryzen 3 2200U

The Ryzen 3 2200U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,583 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The PRO A10-8770 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 3 2200U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the PRO A10-8770 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the PRO A10-8770 versus 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 2200U — a 11.1% clock advantage for the PRO A10-8770 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The PRO A10-8770 uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Ryzen 3 2200U uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the PRO A10-8770 scores 3,547 against the Ryzen 3 2200U's 3,583 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen 3 2200U.

Feature	PRO A10-8770	Ryzen 3 2200U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+12%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+40%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Carrizo (2015−2018)	Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
PassMark	3,547	3,583+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The PRO A10-8770 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 2200U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.