
Pentium Dual Core T3200 vs PRO A10-8770

Pentium Dual Core T3200

PRO A10-8770
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium Dual Core T3200 is positioned at rank 375 and the PRO A10-8770 is on rank 300, so the PRO A10-8770 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Pentium Dual Core T3200
Performance Per Dollar PRO A10-8770
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Pentium Dual Core T3200 | PRO A10-8770 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Carrizo (2015−2018) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Pentium Dual Core T3200 | PRO A10-8770 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Pentium Dual Core T3200 and PRO A10-8770

Pentium Dual Core T3200
The Pentium Dual Core T3200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 3,600 points. Launch price was $69.

PRO A10-8770
The PRO A10-8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,547 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Pentium Dual Core T3200 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the PRO A10-8770 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the PRO A10-8770 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T3200 versus 3.8 GHz on the PRO A10-8770 — a 62.1% clock advantage for the PRO A10-8770. The Pentium Dual Core T3200 uses the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the PRO A10-8770 uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium Dual Core T3200 scores 3,600 against the PRO A10-8770's 3,547 — a 1.5% lead for the Pentium Dual Core T3200.
| Feature | Pentium Dual Core T3200 | PRO A10-8770 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 3.8 GHz+90% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.5 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2048 kB+100% |
| Process | 65 nm | 28 nm-57% |
| Architecture | NetBurst (2000−2006) | Carrizo (2015−2018) |
| PassMark | 3,600+1% | 3,547 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 235 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 408 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: No (Pentium Dual Core T3200) / not specified (PRO A10-8770).
| Feature | Pentium Dual Core T3200 | PRO A10-8770 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | No | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















