Athlon X4 950 vs Pentium Dual Core T3200
Athlon X4 950
Pentium Dual Core T3200
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon X4 950 is positioned at rank 344 and the Pentium Dual Core T3200 is on rank 375, so the Athlon X4 950 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon X4 950
Performance Per Dollar Pentium Dual Core T3200
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon X4 950 | Pentium Dual Core T3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon X4 950 | Pentium Dual Core T3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+202%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon X4 950 and Pentium Dual Core T3200
Athlon X4 950
The Athlon X4 950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,576 points. Launch price was $60.
Pentium Dual Core T3200
The Pentium Dual Core T3200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 3,600 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Athlon X4 950 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium Dual Core T3200 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon X4 950 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Athlon X4 950 versus 2 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T3200 — a 62.1% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 950. The Athlon X4 950 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T3200 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 950 scores 3,576 against the Pentium Dual Core T3200's 3,600 — a 0.7% lead for the Pentium Dual Core T3200. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 656 vs 235, a 94.5% lead for the Athlon X4 950 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,637 vs 408 (120.2% advantage for the Athlon X4 950).
| Feature | Athlon X4 950 | Pentium Dual Core T3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+90% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB+100% |
| Process | 28 nm-57% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | NetBurst (2000−2006) |
| PassMark | 3,576 | 3,600 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 656+179% | 235 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,637+301% | 408 |
Memory & Platform
Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Athlon X4 950 versus DDR2-667 on the Pentium Dual Core T3200 — the Athlon X4 950 supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 950 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon X4 950) vs 0 (Pentium Dual Core T3200) — the Athlon X4 950 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Socket AM4 (Athlon X4 950) and PM965,GM965,GL960 (Pentium Dual Core T3200).
| Feature | Athlon X4 950 | Pentium Dual Core T3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | — |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+100% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+1500% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon X4 950) vs No (Pentium Dual Core T3200).
| Feature | Athlon X4 950 | Pentium Dual Core T3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | No |
Value Analysis
The Athlon X4 950 launched at $58 MSRP, while the Pentium Dual Core T3200 debuted at $64. At current prices ($15 vs $5), the Pentium Dual Core T3200 is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 950 delivers 238.4 pts/$ vs 720.0 pts/$ for the Pentium Dual Core T3200 — making the Pentium Dual Core T3200 the 100.5% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon X4 950 | Pentium Dual Core T3200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $58-9% | $64 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $5-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 238.4 | 720.0+202% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon X4 950 and Pentium Dual Core T3200
