Athlon X4 950 vs Core i3-4170

CPU

GPU

Athlon X4 950

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i3-4170

2 Cores4 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2014

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Athlon X4 950 vs Core i3-4170 Performance Spectrum

Athlon X4 950

4 / 4

3,576

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-4170

2 / 4

3,626

+1.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X4 950 vs Core i3-4170 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X4 950 vs Core i3-4170: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X4 950

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $59 less on MSRP ($58 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
✅Delivers 98.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 31.0 PassMark/$ ($58 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (656 vs 1,140).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,637 vs 1,897).
❌20.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 54W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4170 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i3-4170

2014

Why buy it

✅+73.8% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 54W instead of 65W, a 11W reduction.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4400, while Athlon X4 950 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $58 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4170 better than Athlon X4 950?

Yes. Core i3-4170 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 15.9% better Geekbench multi-core, and 1.4% higher PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-4170 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4170 is the stronger fit. You are getting 15.9% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4170 is still the better call for a fresh build. Core i3-4170 comes in 101.7% more expensive on MSRP at $117 MSRP versus $58 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon X4 950 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 3,576 PassMark with 4 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon X4 950 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon X4 950 vs Core i3-4170 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 950

The Athlon X4 950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,576 points. Launch price was $60.

Core i3-4170

The Core i3-4170 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,626 points. Launch price was $117.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon X4 950 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4170 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon X4 950 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Athlon X4 950 versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i3-4170 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 950 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Athlon X4 950 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-4170 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 950 scores 3,576 against the Core i3-4170's 3,626 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i3-4170. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 656 vs 1,140, a 53.9% lead for the Core i3-4170 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,637 vs 1,897 (14.7% advantage for the Core i3-4170). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon X4 950 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4170.

Feature	Athlon X4 950	Core i3-4170
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+3%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz	3.7 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	3,576	3,626+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	656	1,140+74%
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,637	1,897+16%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X4 950 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4170 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Athlon X4 950 versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4170 — the Athlon X4 950 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 950 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon X4 950) vs 16 (Core i3-4170) — the Core i3-4170 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Socket AM4 (Athlon X4 950) and LGA1150 (Core i3-4170).

Feature	Athlon X4 950	Core i3-4170
Socket	AM4	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+50%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon X4 950) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4170). The Core i3-4170 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the Athlon X4 950 requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Athlon X4 950	Core i3-4170
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	HD Graphics 4400
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon X4 950 was priced at $58, while the Core i3-4170 came in at $117. On launch pricing ($58 vs $117), Athlon X4 950 was $59 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 950 delivers 61.7 pts/$ vs 31.0 pts/$ for the Core i3-4170 — making the Athlon X4 950 the 66.2% better value option.

Feature	Athlon X4 950	Core i3-4170
MSRP	$58-50%	$117
Performance per Dollar	61.7+99%	31.0
Release Date	2017	2014

Search Athlon X4 950 on Amazon

Search Core i3-4170 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.