Pentium Dual Core T3200 vs Xeon E5620

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium Dual Core T3200 vs Xeon E5620 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium Dual Core T3200 vs Xeon E5620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium Dual Core T3200

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 80W, a 79W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5620 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,600 vs 3,621).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5620, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $64 MSRP, while Xeon E5620 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5620

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌7900% higher power demand at 80W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5620 better than Pentium Dual Core T3200?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5620 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Pentium Dual Core T3200 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5620 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5620 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5620 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon E5620 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $64 MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium Dual Core T3200 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (56.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on that older platform.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5620 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Pentium Dual Core T3200 vs Xeon E5620 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium Dual Core T3200

The Pentium Dual Core T3200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 3,600 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon E5620

The Xeon E5620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,621 points. Launch price was $35.

⚡

Processing Power

The Pentium Dual Core T3200 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon E5620 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5620 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T3200 versus 2.66 GHz on the Xeon E5620 — a 28.3% clock advantage for the Xeon E5620. The Pentium Dual Core T3200 uses the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Xeon E5620 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium Dual Core T3200 scores 3,600 against the Xeon E5620's 3,621 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5620.

Feature	Pentium Dual Core T3200	Xeon E5620
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.66 GHz+33%
Base Clock	—	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	—	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	65 nm	32 nm-51%
Architecture	NetBurst (2000−2006)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	3,600	3,621
Geekbench 6 Single	235	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	408	—