Pentium G4560 vs PRO A10-8770

Pentium G4560 vs PRO A10-8770 Performance Spectrum

Pentium G4560

2 / 4

3,536

0.0%

Core i3-2120

Core 2 Duo T6670

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

3,547

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium G4560 vs PRO A10-8770 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium G4560 vs PRO A10-8770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium G4560

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 51W instead of 65W, a 14W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 610, while PRO A10-8770 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than PRO A10-8770 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,536 vs 3,547).
❌Launch MSRP is still $64 MSRP, while PRO A10-8770 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

PRO A10-8770

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌27.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 51W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium G4560 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is PRO A10-8770 better than Pentium G4560?

Yes. PRO A10-8770 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, PRO A10-8770 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, PRO A10-8770 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

PRO A10-8770 is still the much better call for a fresh build. PRO A10-8770 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $64 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium G4560 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (55.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A10-8770 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Pentium G4560 vs PRO A10-8770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium G4560

The Pentium G4560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,536 points. Launch price was $108.

PRO A10-8770

The PRO A10-8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,547 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Pentium G4560 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the PRO A10-8770 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the PRO A10-8770 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Pentium G4560 versus 3.8 GHz on the PRO A10-8770 — a 8.2% clock advantage for the PRO A10-8770 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Pentium G4560 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the PRO A10-8770 uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium G4560 scores 3,536 against the PRO A10-8770's 3,547 — a 0.3% lead for the PRO A10-8770.

Feature	Pentium G4560	PRO A10-8770
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	3.8 GHz+9%
Base Clock	3.5 GHz	3.5 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2048 kB+700%
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	3,536	3,547

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium G4560 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the PRO A10-8770 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Pentium G4560	PRO A10-8770
Socket	LGA1151	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Pentium G4560) / not specified (PRO A10-8770). The Pentium G4560 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the PRO A10-8770 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium G4560 targets Desktop.