
Athlon II X4 651
Popular choices:

Pentium G4560
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Athlon II X4 651
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.0 vs 55.3 PassMark/$ ($92 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
- ❌96.1% higher power demand at 100W vs 51W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium G4560 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Pentium G4560
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $28 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $92 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 41.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 55.3 vs 39.0 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $92 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 51W instead of 100W, a 49W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 610, while Athlon II X4 651 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon II X4 651 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,536 vs 3,584).
Athlon II X4 651
2011Pentium G4560
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $28 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $92 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 41.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 55.3 vs 39.0 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $92 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 51W instead of 100W, a 49W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 610, while Athlon II X4 651 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.0 vs 55.3 PassMark/$ ($92 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
- ❌96.1% higher power demand at 100W vs 51W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium G4560 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon II X4 651 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,536 vs 3,584).
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X4 651 better than Pentium G4560?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Athlon II X4 651 | Pentium G4560 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Athlon II X4 651 | Pentium G4560 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 28 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Athlon II X4 651 | Pentium G4560 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Athlon II X4 651 | Pentium G4560 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X4 651 and Pentium G4560

Athlon II X4 651
Athlon II X4 651
The Athlon II X4 651 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,584 points. Launch price was $149.

Pentium G4560
Pentium G4560
The Pentium G4560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,536 points. Launch price was $108.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X4 651 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium G4560 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X4 651 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Athlon II X4 651 versus 3.5 GHz on the Pentium G4560 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Pentium G4560 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Athlon II X4 651 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium G4560 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 651 scores 3,584 against the Pentium G4560's 3,536 — a 1.3% lead for the Athlon II X4 651. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 651 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G4560.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 651 | Pentium G4560 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.5 GHz+17% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.5 GHz+17% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+300% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Llano (2011−2012) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 3,584+1% | 3,536 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X4 651 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G4560 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Athlon II X4 651 versus DDR4-2400 on the Pentium G4560 — the Pentium G4560 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium G4560 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 651 | Pentium G4560 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM1 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | DDR4-2400+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 64 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon II X4 651) / VT-x, VT-d (Pentium G4560). The Pentium G4560 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the Athlon II X4 651 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium G4560 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 651 | Pentium G4560 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 610 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Athlon II X4 651 launched at $92 MSRP, while the Pentium G4560 debuted at $64. On MSRP ($92 vs $64), the Pentium G4560 is $28 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 651 delivers 39.0 pts/$ vs 55.3 pts/$ for the Pentium G4560 — making the Pentium G4560 the 34.6% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 651 | Pentium G4560 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $92 | $64-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.0 | 55.3+42% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













