
Athlon X4 950

Pentium G4560
Athlon X4 950 vs Pentium G4560 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon X4 950 vs Pentium G4560 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon X4 950 vs Pentium G4560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon X4 950
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $6 less on MSRP ($58 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 11.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 55.3 PassMark/$ ($58 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium G4560.
Trade-offs
- ❌27.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 51W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium G4560 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Pentium G4560
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 51W instead of 65W, a 14W reduction.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 610, while Athlon X4 950 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 950 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,536 vs 3,576).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 55.3 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $58 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon X4 950.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon X4 950 better than Pentium G4560?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon X4 950 vs Pentium G4560 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 950
The Athlon X4 950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,576 points. Launch price was $60.

Pentium G4560
The Pentium G4560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,536 points. Launch price was $108.
Processing Power
The Athlon X4 950 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium G4560 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon X4 950 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Athlon X4 950 versus 3.5 GHz on the Pentium G4560 — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 950 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Athlon X4 950 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium G4560 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 950 scores 3,576 against the Pentium G4560's 3,536 — a 1.1% lead for the Athlon X4 950. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon X4 950 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G4560.
| Feature | Athlon X4 950 | Pentium G4560 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+9% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | 14 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 3,576+1% | 3,536 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 656 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,637 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon X4 950 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G4560 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon X4 950) vs 16 (Pentium G4560) — the Pentium G4560 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Athlon X4 950 | Pentium G4560 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon X4 950) vs VT-x, VT-d (Pentium G4560). The Pentium G4560 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the Athlon X4 950 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium G4560 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Athlon X4 950 | Pentium G4560 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 610 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon X4 950 was priced at $58, while the Pentium G4560 came in at $64. On launch pricing ($58 vs $64), Athlon X4 950 was $6 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 950 delivers 61.7 pts/$ vs 55.3 pts/$ for the Pentium G4560 — making the Athlon X4 950 the 11% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon X4 950 | Pentium G4560 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $58-9% | $64 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.7+12% | 55.3 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















