
Core i7-2630QM

Pentium G4560
Core i7-2630QM vs Pentium G4560 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-2630QM vs Pentium G4560 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-2630QM vs Pentium G4560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-2630QM
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 51W, a 6W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.4 vs 55.3 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
Pentium G4560
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $314 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 488.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 55.3 vs 9.4 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2630QM across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,536 vs 3,550).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-2630QM better than Pentium G4560?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-2630QM vs Pentium G4560 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-2630QM
The Core i7-2630QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,550 points. Launch price was $378.

Pentium G4560
The Pentium G4560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,536 points. Launch price was $108.
Processing Power
The Core i7-2630QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Pentium G4560 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-2630QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Core i7-2630QM versus 3.5 GHz on the Pentium G4560 — a 18.8% clock advantage for the Pentium G4560 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-2630QM uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium G4560 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2630QM scores 3,550 against the Pentium G4560's 3,536 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-2630QM. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2630QM vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G4560.
| Feature | Core i7-2630QM | Pentium G4560 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.5 GHz+21% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.5 GHz+75% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total)+100% | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 3,550 | 3,536 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-2630QM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G4560 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Core i7-2630QM versus DDR4-2400 on the Pentium G4560 — the Pentium G4560 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium G4560 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Core i7-2630QM | Pentium G4560 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600 | DDR4-2400+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 64 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-2630QM) vs VT-x, VT-d (Pentium G4560). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2630QM) and HD Graphics 610 (Pentium G4560) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium G4560 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-2630QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.
| Feature | Core i7-2630QM | Pentium G4560 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | HD Graphics 610 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-2630QM was priced at $378, while the Pentium G4560 came in at $64. On launch pricing ($378 vs $64), Pentium G4560 was $314 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-2630QM delivers 9.4 pts/$ vs 55.3 pts/$ for the Pentium G4560 — making the Pentium G4560 the 141.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-2630QM | Pentium G4560 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $378 | $64-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.4 | 55.3+488% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















