Core i7-2630QM
VS
PRO A10-9700

Core i7-2630QM vs PRO A10-9700

Intel

Core i7-2630QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2011
VS
AMD

PRO A10-9700

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2630QM is positioned at rank 1094 and the PRO A10-9700 is on rank 295, so the PRO A10-9700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2630QM

#1082
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3125%
#1083
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3079%
#1084
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2826%
#1085
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2814%
#1086
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2788%
#1088
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2692%
#1089
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2581%
#1090
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2577%
#1091
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2508%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
99%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1101
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
98%
#1102
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
96%
#1106
Core i5-2430M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
95%
#1108
Pentium Dual Core T4500
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
95%
#1109
Celeron B820
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar PRO A10-9700

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
4329%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4091%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
2970%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
895%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
709%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
620%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
355%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
351%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
319%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
319%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
316%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
307%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
303%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
302%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
299%
#274
Core i7-9700K
MSRP: $385|Avg: $200
100%
#275
Core i3-10320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $140
99%
#276
Core i5-9600KF
MSRP: $262|Avg: $150
99%
#277
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE
MSRP: $180|Avg: $180
98%
#278
Core i7-14701TE
MSRP: $392|Avg: $390
98%
#279
Core i9-11900KF
MSRP: $513|Avg: $349
98%
#280
Athlon Silver 3050GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $65
97%
#281
Core i7-9700E
MSRP: $259|Avg: $180
97%
#282
Core i7-11700K
MSRP: $399|Avg: $350
97%
#283
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
96%
#284
Core i7-14701E
MSRP: $392|Avg: $380
96%
#285
Core i5-10400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $175
95%
#295
PRO A10-9700
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The PRO A10-9700 (2017) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i7-2630QMPRO A10-9700
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-2630QM (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i7-2630QMPRO A10-9700
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2630QM and PRO A10-9700

Intel

Core i7-2630QM

The Core i7-2630QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,550 points. Launch price was $378.

AMD

PRO A10-9700

The PRO A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,600 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i7-2630QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the PRO A10-9700's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Core i7-2630QM versus 3.8 GHz on the PRO A10-9700 — a 26.9% clock advantage for the PRO A10-9700 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-2630QM uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the PRO A10-9700 uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2630QM scores 3,550 against the PRO A10-9700's 3,600 — a 1.4% lead for the PRO A10-9700.

FeatureCore i7-2630QMPRO A10-9700
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz
3.8 GHz+31%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.5 GHz+75%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2048 kB+700%
Process
32 nm
28 nm-13%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark
3,550
3,600+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2630QM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the PRO A10-9700 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-2630QMPRO A10-9700
Socket
PGA988
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
1600
Max RAM Capacity
32
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-2630QM) / not specified (PRO A10-9700). The Core i7-2630QM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the PRO A10-9700 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-2630QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.

FeatureCore i7-2630QMPRO A10-9700
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true