Core i7-2630QM
VS
Xeon E5620

Core i7-2630QM vs Xeon E5620

Intel

Core i7-2630QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Xeon E5620

4 Cores8 Thrd80 WWMax: 2.66 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2630QM is positioned at rank 1094 and the Xeon E5620 is on rank 649, so the Xeon E5620 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2630QM

#1082
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3125%
#1083
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3079%
#1084
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2826%
#1085
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2814%
#1086
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2788%
#1088
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2692%
#1089
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2581%
#1090
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2577%
#1091
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2508%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
99%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1101
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
98%
#1102
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
96%
#1106
Core i5-2430M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
95%
#1108
Pentium Dual Core T4500
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
95%
#1109
Celeron B820
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5620

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
11476%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2167%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1925%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1487%
#385
EPYC 9375F
MSRP: $5306|Avg: $108
100%
#386
Xeon w9-3475X
MSRP: $3739|Avg: $3930
96%
#388
EPYC 9254
MSRP: $3761|Avg: $1099
94%
#389
Xeon Gold 5220R
MSRP: $1780|Avg: $1015
94%
#390
EPYC 9555P
MSRP: $7983|Avg: $6130
94%
#391
Xeon Gold 5218
MSRP: $1273|Avg: $500
94%
#649
Xeon E5620
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#650
Xeon E3-1275L v3
MSRP: $350|Avg: $29
100%
#652
Xeon E5-1650 v3
MSRP: $583|Avg: N/A
98%
#654
Xeon E3-1225
MSRP: $224|Avg: $205
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5620 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i7-2630QMXeon E5620
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-2630QM ($378), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($378 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i7-2630QMXeon E5620
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2630QM and Xeon E5620

Intel

Core i7-2630QM

The Core i7-2630QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,550 points. Launch price was $378.

Intel

Xeon E5620

The Xeon E5620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,621 points. Launch price was $35.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-2630QM and Xeon E5620 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Core i7-2630QM versus 2.66 GHz on the Xeon E5620 — a 8.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-2630QM (base: 2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-2630QM uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5620 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2630QM scores 3,550 against the Xeon E5620's 3,621 — a 2% lead for the Xeon E5620. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2630QM vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E5620.

FeatureCore i7-2630QMXeon E5620
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz+9%
2.66 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.4 GHz+20%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
12 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark
3,550
3,621+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2630QM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5620 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-2630QMXeon E5620
Socket
PGA988
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1600
Max RAM Capacity
32
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-2630QM) / not specified (Xeon E5620). The Core i7-2630QM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Xeon E5620 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-2630QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.

FeatureCore i7-2630QMXeon E5620
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true