
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 vs Radeon HD 8770

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8770
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is positioned at rank 224 and the Radeon HD 8770 is on rank 271, so the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8770
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2013). The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 8770 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8770 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 223.4% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700.
| Insight | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-223.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+223.4%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 4.0 (2025) (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 8770 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $150 (vs $100), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 115.6% better value per dollar than the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700.
| Insight | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+115.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 and Radeon HD 8770

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 806 points. Launch price was $1,299.

Radeon HD 8770
The Radeon HD 8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,607 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 scores 806 versus the Radeon HD 8770's 2,607 — the Radeon HD 8770 leads by 223.4%. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is built on Bristol Ridge while the Radeon HD 8770 uses GCN 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 384 (Radeon HD 8770). Raw compute: 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8770). Boost clocks: 2920 MHz vs 825 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 806 | 2,607+223% |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+967% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 47.84 TFLOPS+7451% | 0.6336 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2920 MHz+254% | 825 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+1500% | 8 |
| TMUs | 256+967% | 24 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+3100% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8770 has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 8770 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 8770) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 96 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+3100% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 12_0 (Radeon HD 8770). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon HD 8770). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs UVD 4.0.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | UVD 4.0 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 draws 300W versus the Radeon HD 8770's 50W — a 142.9% difference. The Radeon HD 8770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 50W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 240mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 2.7 | 52.1+1830% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 launched at $169 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Radeon HD 8770 launched at $150 and now averages $150. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 costs 33.3% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.1 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 17.4 (Radeon HD 8770) — the Radeon HD 8770 offers 114.8% better value. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $150-11% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-33% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.1 | 17.4+115% |
| Codename | Navi 48 | Mars |
| Release | July 23 2025 | April 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #23 | #844 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















