G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 vs Radeon HD 8770 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 vs Radeon HD 8770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

2025

Why buy it

✅23.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 240mm, a 239mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (806 vs 2,607).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
12.7% HIGHER MSRP
$169 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 17.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌500% higher power demand at 300W vs 50W.

Radeon HD 8770

2013

Why buy it

✅+223.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $19 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
✅Delivers 264.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.4 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 300W, a 250W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌23900% longer card at 240mm vs 1mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 23.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 8770 instead at 2,607 vs 806, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 8770 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $19 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $169, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 264.4% (17.4 vs 4.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8770 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 vs Radeon HD 8770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 806 points. Launch price was $1,299.

Radeon HD 8770

The Radeon HD 8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,607 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 scores 806 versus the Radeon HD 8770's 2,607 — the Radeon HD 8770 leads by 223.4%. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is built on Bristol Ridge while the Radeon HD 8770 uses GCN 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 384 (Radeon HD 8770). Raw compute: 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8770). Boost clocks: 2920 MHz vs 825 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700	Radeon HD 8770
G3D Mark Score	806	2,607+223%
Architecture	Bristol Ridge	GCN 1.0
Process Node	4 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	4096+967%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	47.84 TFLOPS+7451%	0.6336 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2920 MHz+254%	825 MHz
ROPs	128+1500%	8
TMUs	256+967%	24
L2 Cache	8 MB+3100%	0.25 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700	Radeon HD 8770
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8770 carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 8770 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8770. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 8770) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700	Radeon HD 8770
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	96 GB/s
Bus Width	System	128-bit
L2 Cache	8 MB+3100%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 12_0 (Radeon HD 8770). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

Feature	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700	Radeon HD 8770
DirectX	12	12_0
Max Displays	0	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon HD 8770). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs UVD 4.0.

Feature	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700	Radeon HD 8770
Encoder	VCE 3.0	VCE 2.0
Decoder	UVD 6.0	UVD 4.0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 draws 300W versus the Radeon HD 8770's 50W — a 142.9% difference. The Radeon HD 8770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700	Radeon HD 8770
TDP	300W	50W-83%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	1mm	240mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Perf/Watt	2.7	52.1+1830%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 came in at $169, while the Radeon HD 8770 launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8770 was 11.2% cheaper ($19 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.8 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) vs 17.4 (Radeon HD 8770) — the Radeon HD 8770 offers 262.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 (2025 vs 2013).

Feature	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700	Radeon HD 8770
MSRP	$169	$150-11%
Performance per Dollar	4.8	17.4+262%
Codename	Navi 48	Mars
Release	July 23 2025	April 1 2013
Ranking	#23	#844

Search Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8770 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.