Core i3-1000NG4 vs PRO A10-8770

Core i3-1000NG4 vs PRO A10-8770 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-1000NG4

2 / 4

3,530

0.0%

Core i7-620M

Core 2 Duo T6670

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

3,547

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-1000NG4 vs PRO A10-8770 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-1000NG4 vs PRO A10-8770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-1000NG4

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 9W instead of 65W, a 56W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than PRO A10-8770 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,530 vs 3,547).

PRO A10-8770

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌622.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 9W.

Quick Answers

So, is PRO A10-8770 better than Core i3-1000NG4?

Yes. PRO A10-8770 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, PRO A10-8770 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, PRO A10-8770 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

PRO A10-8770 still makes the most sense overall. PRO A10-8770 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-1000NG4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-1000NG4 vs PRO A10-8770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1000NG4

The Core i3-1000NG4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-Y (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1044. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR4-3733. Passmark benchmark score: 3,530 points. Launch price was $69.

PRO A10-8770

The PRO A10-8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,547 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-1000NG4 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the PRO A10-8770 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the PRO A10-8770 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-1000NG4 versus 3.8 GHz on the PRO A10-8770 — a 17.1% clock advantage for the PRO A10-8770 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i3-1000NG4 uses the Ice Lake-Y (2020) architecture (10 nm), while the PRO A10-8770 uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1000NG4 scores 3,530 against the PRO A10-8770's 3,547 — a 0.5% lead for the PRO A10-8770.

Feature	Core i3-1000NG4	PRO A10-8770
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.8 GHz+19%
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	3.5 GHz+218%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2048 kB+700%
Process	10 nm-64%	28 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake-Y (2020)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	3,530	3,547

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-1000NG4 uses the BGA1044 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the PRO A10-8770 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.