Core i3-1000NG4 vs Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Core i3-1000NG4 vs Ryzen Embedded V1202B Performance Spectrum

Core i3-1000NG4

2 / 4

3,530

+0.5%

Core i7-620M

Core 2 Duo T6670

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

2 / 4

3,512

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-1000NG4 vs Ryzen Embedded V1202B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-1000NG4 vs Ryzen Embedded V1202B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-1000NG4

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 9W instead of 15W, a 6W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Embedded V1202B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,512 vs 3,530).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Core i3-1000NG4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 15W vs 9W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-1000NG4 better than Ryzen Embedded V1202B?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Embedded V1202B is ahead with a 6.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-1000NG4 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Core i3-1000NG4 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-1000NG4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-1000NG4 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i3-1000NG4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. Ryzen Embedded V1202B only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-1000NG4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2018), 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-1000NG4 vs Ryzen Embedded V1202B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1000NG4

The Core i3-1000NG4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-Y (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1044. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR4-3733. Passmark benchmark score: 3,530 points. Launch price was $69.

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

The Ryzen Embedded V1202B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,512 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-1000NG4 and Ryzen Embedded V1202B share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-1000NG4 versus 3.2 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1202B — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i3-1000NG4 uses the Ice Lake-Y (2020) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V1202B uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1000NG4 scores 3,530 against the Ryzen Embedded V1202B's 3,512 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-1000NG4. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-1000NG4 vs 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1202B.

Feature	Core i3-1000NG4	Ryzen Embedded V1202B
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	2.3 GHz+109%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)+100%	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake-Y (2020)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	3,530	3,512

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-1000NG4 uses the BGA1044 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V1202B uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.