
Ryzen 3 3100

Xeon 6315P
Ryzen 3 3100 vs Xeon 6315P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 3 3100 vs Xeon 6315P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 3 3100 vs Xeon 6315P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 3 3100
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +16.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- β Costs $1,067 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $1,166 MSRP).
- β Delivers 1098.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 120.5 vs 10.1 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $1,166 MSRP).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- β18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
- βOlder platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6315P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Xeon 6315P
2025Why buy it
- β Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- β Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 3100 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (11,721 vs 11,928).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 10.1 vs 120.5 PassMark/$ ($1,166 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 3100 better than Xeon 6315P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 3100 vs Xeon 6315P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 3 3100
The Ryzen 3 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,928 points. Launch price was $99.

Xeon 6315P
The Xeon 6315P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023β2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 11,721 points. Launch price was $213.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 3100 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon 6315P's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3100 versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon 6315P β a 14.3% clock advantage for the Xeon 6315P (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 3 3100 uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon 6315P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023β2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 3100 scores 11,928 against the Xeon 6315P's 11,721 β a 1.8% lead for the Ryzen 3 3100. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3100 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon 6315P.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 3100 | Xeon 6315P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.5 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+29% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+33% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+40860% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) | Raptor Lake-R (2023β2025) |
| PassMark | 11,928+2% | 11,721 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 3100 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6315P uses LGA1700 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 3100 | Xeon 6315P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | Yes | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 3100) / not specified (Xeon 6315P). Primary use case: Ryzen 3 3100 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 3100 | Xeon 6315P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | β |
| Unlocked | Yes | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | β |
| Target Use | Desktop | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 3 3100 was priced at $99, while the Xeon 6315P came in at $1166. On launch pricing ($99 vs $1166), Ryzen 3 3100 was $1067 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 3100 delivers 120.5 pts/$ vs 10.1 pts/$ for the Xeon 6315P β making the Ryzen 3 3100 the 169.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 3100 | Xeon 6315P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-92% | $1166 |
| Performance per Dollar | 120.5+1093% | 10.1 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














