Ryzen 3 3100 vs Xeon E5-2692 v2

Ryzen 3 3100 vs Xeon E5-2692 v2 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 3100

4 / 8

11,928

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2692 v2

12 / 24

12,119

+1.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 3100 vs Xeon E5-2692 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 3100 vs Xeon E5-2692 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 3100

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 100W, a 35W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (11,928 vs 12,119).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2692 v2, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2692 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2692 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌53.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 3100 better than Xeon E5-2692 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2692 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 3100 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2692 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 3100 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 3 3100 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $99 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2692 v2 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.6% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (120.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 3100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 3 3100 vs Xeon E5-2692 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 3100

The Ryzen 3 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,928 points. Launch price was $99.

Xeon E5-2692 v2

The Xeon E5-2692 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 12,119 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 3100 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2692 v2 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2692 v2 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3100 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2692 v2 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 3100 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 3 3100 uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2692 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 3100 scores 11,928 against the Xeon E5-2692 v2's 12,119 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2692 v2. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3100 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2692 v2.

Feature	Ryzen 3 3100	Xeon E5-2692 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	12 / 24+200%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+30%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+64%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+88%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	11,928	12,119+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 3100 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2692 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.