Ryzen 3 3200U
VS
Core i7-2710QE

Ryzen 3 3200U vs Core i7-2710QE

AMD

Ryzen 3 3200U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Core i7-2710QE

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2710QE

#1072
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2958%
#1073
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2914%
#1074
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2675%
#1075
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2663%
#1076
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2639%
#1078
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2548%
#1079
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2444%
#1080
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2440%
#1081
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2374%
#1084
Core i7-2710QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $40
100%
#1089
Core i5-3610ME
MSRP: $276|Avg: $22
97%
#1090
Core m3-7Y32
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1092
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
96%
#1093
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
96%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
94%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
94%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 3 3200U (2019) utilizes 12 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightRyzen 3 3200UCore i7-2710QE
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Picasso-U (Zen) (2019) / 12 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-2710QE (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightRyzen 3 3200UCore i7-2710QE
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 3200U and Core i7-2710QE

AMD

Ryzen 3 3200U

The Ryzen 3 3200U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso-U (Zen) (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,730 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i7-2710QE

The Core i7-2710QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,749 points. Launch price was $378.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 3200U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-2710QE offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-2710QE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3200U versus 3 GHz on the Core i7-2710QE — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 3200U (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 3 3200U uses the Picasso-U (Zen) (2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Core i7-2710QE uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 3200U scores 3,730 against the Core i7-2710QE's 3,749 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-2710QE. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3200U vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2710QE.

FeatureRyzen 3 3200UCore i7-2710QE
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz+17%
3 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz+24%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+100%
256K (per core)
Process
12 nm-63%
32 nm
Architecture
Picasso-U (Zen) (2019)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
3,730
3,749
Geekbench 6 Single
604
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 3200U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2710QE uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 3 3200UCore i7-2710QE
Socket
FP5
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 3 3200U) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2710QE). The Core i7-2710QE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Ryzen 3 3200U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2710QE targets Embedded/Industrial. Direct competitor: Core i7-2710QE rivals Embedded R-Series.

FeatureRyzen 3 3200UCore i7-2710QE
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Embedded/Industrial