Ryzen 3 3250U
VS
FX-6100

Ryzen 3 3250U vs FX-6100

AMD

Ryzen 3 3250U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2020
VS
AMD

FX-6100

6 Cores6 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Ryzen 3 3250U is positioned at rank 983 and the FX-6100 is on rank 741, so the FX-6100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 3 3250U

#971
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1973%
#972
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1944%
#973
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1785%
#974
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1777%
#975
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1760%
#977
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1700%
#978
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1630%
#979
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1627%
#980
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1584%
#983
Ryzen 3 3250U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#986
Pro A8-8600B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
99%
#991
Pentium 8500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
98%
#992
A6-8500P
MSRP: $100|Avg: $16
97%
#994
Core i7-4700EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $180
96%
#995
Core i3-8145UE
MSRP: $281|Avg: $50
96%
#996
Core i7-4712MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $60
95%
#997
Core i7-3615QE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $100
94%
#998
Celeron M U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar FX-6100

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
13953%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
13184%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9573%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2884%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2284%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1998%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1145%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1130%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1029%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1028%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1017%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
990%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
976%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
972%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
963%
#288
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
99%
#392
Celeron G4920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $115
99%
#741
FX-6100
MSRP: $165|Avg: $25
100%
#742
Pentium G2020T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
100%
#743
Core i7-4771
MSRP: $320|Avg: $78
100%
#746
Core i7-4770S
MSRP: $305|Avg: $35
99%
#747
Core i5-6400T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $40
99%
#749
Core i5-3570K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
99%
#750
Athlon II X3 455
MSRP: $88|Avg: $15
99%
#751
Core i5-3570S
MSRP: $213|Avg: $59
98%
#752
Core i7-3770
MSRP: $294|Avg: $60
98%
#753
Pentium G2120
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
98%
#754
Core i5-3340S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $25
97%
#755
Celeron G1101
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
97%
#756
FX-8150
MSRP: $245|Avg: $50
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 3 3250U (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightRyzen 3 3250UFX-6100
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Picasso (2019−2022) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-6100 (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightRyzen 3 3250UFX-6100
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 3250U and FX-6100

AMD

Ryzen 3 3250U

The Ryzen 3 3250U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,718 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

FX-6100

The FX-6100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,686 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 3250U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-6100 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6100 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3250U versus 3.9 GHz on the FX-6100 — a 10.8% clock advantage for the FX-6100 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 3 3250U uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-6100 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 3250U scores 3,718 against the FX-6100's 3,686 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 3 3250U. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3250U vs 8 MB (total) on the FX-6100.

FeatureRyzen 3 3250UFX-6100
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
6 / 6+200%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
3.9 GHz+11%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
3.3 GHz+27%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
6 MB+1100%
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Picasso (2019−2022)
Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark
3,718
3,686
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 3250U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-6100 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 3 3250UFX-6100
Socket
FP5
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0