Ryzen 3 3250U
VS
PRO A12-9800

Ryzen 3 3250U vs PRO A12-9800

AMD

Ryzen 3 3250U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2020
VS
AMD

PRO A12-9800

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Ryzen 3 3250U is positioned at rank 983 and the PRO A12-9800 is on rank 282, so the PRO A12-9800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 3 3250U

#971
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1973%
#972
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1944%
#973
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1785%
#974
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1777%
#975
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1760%
#977
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1700%
#978
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1630%
#979
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1627%
#980
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1584%
#983
Ryzen 3 3250U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#986
Pro A8-8600B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
99%
#991
Pentium 8500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
98%
#992
A6-8500P
MSRP: $100|Avg: $16
97%
#994
Core i7-4700EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $180
96%
#995
Core i3-8145UE
MSRP: $281|Avg: $50
96%
#996
Core i7-4712MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $60
95%
#997
Core i7-3615QE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $100
94%
#998
Celeron M U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar PRO A12-9800

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
4155%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
3926%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
2851%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
859%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
680%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
595%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
341%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
336%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
306%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
306%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
303%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
295%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
291%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
289%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
287%
#263
Core i9-13900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $570
100%
#264
Processor 300T
MSRP: $82|Avg: $82
99%
#265
Athlon 3000G
MSRP: $49|Avg: $60
99%
#266
Athlon 220GE
MSRP: $65|Avg: $60
99%
#267
Ryzen 9 3900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $441
98%
#268
Core i5-10500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $178
98%
#269
Celeron G6900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
98%
#270
Core i9-10850K
MSRP: $453|Avg: $300
98%
#271
Core i9-13900E
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
97%
#272
Core i9-9820X
MSRP: $889|Avg: $280
97%
#273
Core i9-9900X
MSRP: $989|Avg: $300
96%
#274
Core i7-9700K
MSRP: $385|Avg: $200
96%
#282
PRO A12-9800
MSRP: $110|Avg: $55
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 3 3250U (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightRyzen 3 3250UPRO A12-9800
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($55)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Picasso (2019−2022) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The PRO A12-9800 (2016) relies on 28 nm technology and DDR4-2400, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightRyzen 3 3250UPRO A12-9800
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($55)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 3250U and PRO A12-9800

AMD

Ryzen 3 3250U

The Ryzen 3 3250U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,718 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

PRO A12-9800

The PRO A12-9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,751 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 3250U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the PRO A12-9800 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the PRO A12-9800 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3250U versus 4.2 GHz on the PRO A12-9800 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the PRO A12-9800 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 3 3250U uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (14 nm), while the PRO A12-9800 uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 3250U scores 3,718 against the PRO A12-9800's 3,751 — a 0.9% lead for the PRO A12-9800.

FeatureRyzen 3 3250UPRO A12-9800
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
4.2 GHz+20%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
3.8 GHz+46%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
2048 kB+300%
Process
14 nm-50%
28 nm
Architecture
Picasso (2019−2022)
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark
3,718
3,751
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 3250U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the PRO A12-9800 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 3 3250UPRO A12-9800
Socket
FP5
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0