Ryzen 3 3300U vs Xeon E5-1410 v2

Ryzen 3 3300U vs Xeon E5-1410 v2 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 3300U

4 / 4

5,686

0.0%

FX-4350

Ryzen Embedded R1505G

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5-1410 v2

4 / 8

5,715

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 3300U vs Xeon E5-1410 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 3300U vs Xeon E5-1410 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 3300U

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 80W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1410 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,686 vs 5,715).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-1410 v2, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon E5-1410 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌433.3% higher power demand at 80W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-1410 v2 better than Ryzen 3 3300U?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-1410 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 3300U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-1410 v2 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 18.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-1410 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-1410 v2 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-1410 v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 18.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 3300U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 3 3300U vs Xeon E5-1410 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 3300U

The Ryzen 3 3300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,686 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-1410 v2

The Xeon E5-1410 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 5,715 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 3300U packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E5-1410 v2's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3300U versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-1410 v2 — a 9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 3300U (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 3 3300U uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-1410 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 3300U scores 5,686 against the Xeon E5-1410 v2's 5,715 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-1410 v2. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3300U vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1410 v2.

Feature	Ryzen 3 3300U	Xeon E5-1410 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+9%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.8 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	10 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	12 nm-45%	22 nm
Architecture	Picasso (2019−2022)	Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)
PassMark	5,686	5,715

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 3300U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1410 v2 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.