Ryzen 3 4300GE vs Xeon E5-2640 v3

CPU

GPU

Ryzen 3 4300GE

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 4 GHz2020

Ryzen family

······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon E5-2640 v3

8 Cores16 Thrd90 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2014

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 3 4300GE vs Xeon E5-2640 v3 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 4300GE

4 / 8

11,239

+1.7%

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Ryzen 9 7900

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2640 v3

8 / 16

11,055

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 4300GE vs Xeon E5-2640 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 4300GE vs Xeon E5-2640 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 4300GE

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $845 less on MSRP ($94 MSRP vs $939 MSRP).
✅Delivers 915.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 119.6 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($94 MSRP vs $939 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 90W, a 55W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 6, while Xeon E5-2640 v3 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2640 v3.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2640 v3, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon E5-2640 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅+400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (11,055 vs 11,239).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 119.6 PassMark/$ ($939 MSRP vs $94 MSRP).
❌157.1% higher power demand at 90W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 4300GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 4300GE.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 4300GE better than Xeon E5-2640 v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2640 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 4300GE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 3 4300GE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 4300GE is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 4300GE is the better buy right now. Ryzen 3 4300GE comes in $845 cheaper on MSRP at $94 MSRP versus $939 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 915.6% better value on MSRP (119.6 vs 11.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 4300GE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 3 4300GE vs Xeon E5-2640 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 4300GE

The Ryzen 3 4300GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 11,239 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2640 v3

The Xeon E5-2640 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 11,055 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 4300GE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2640 v3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 4300GE versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2640 v3 — a 16.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 4300GE (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 3 4300GE uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 4300GE scores 11,239 against the Xeon E5-2640 v3's 11,055 — a 1.7% lead for the Ryzen 3 4300GE. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 4300GE vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2640 v3.

Feature	Ryzen 3 4300GE	Xeon E5-2640 v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+18%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+35%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	20 MB (total)+400%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Renoir (2020−2023)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	11,239+2%	11,055
Cinebench R23 Multi	5,800	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,472	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,063	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 4300GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 3 4300GE versus DDR4-1866 on the Xeon E5-2640 v3 — the Ryzen 3 4300GE supports 71.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2640 v3 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 3 4300GE) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2640 v3). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 3 4300GE) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2640 v3) — the Xeon E5-2640 v3 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A520,B450,B550,X470,X570 (Ryzen 3 4300GE) and Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2640 v3).

Feature	Ryzen 3 4300GE	Xeon E5-2640 v3
Socket	AM4	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200+71%	DDR4-1866
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	768 GB+1100%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	40+67%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon E5-2640 v3 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Ryzen 3 4300GE) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2640 v3). The Ryzen 3 4300GE includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 6), while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E5-2640 v3 targets Server.

Feature	Ryzen 3 4300GE	Xeon E5-2640 v3
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon Vega 6	—
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	Yes	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 3 4300GE was priced at $94, while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 came in at $939. On launch pricing ($94 vs $939), Ryzen 3 4300GE was $845 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 4300GE delivers 119.6 pts/$ vs 11.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2640 v3 — making the Ryzen 3 4300GE the 164.1% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 3 4300GE	Xeon E5-2640 v3
MSRP	$94-90%	$939
Performance per Dollar	119.6+914%	11.8
Release Date	2020	2014

Search Ryzen 3 4300GE on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2640 v3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.