Ryzen 3 4300U vs Xeon E5-1620 v4

Ryzen 3 4300U vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 4300U

4 / 4

7,359

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5-1620 v4

4 / 8

7,338

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 4300U vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 4300U vs Xeon E5-1620 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 4300U

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 140W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1620 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-1620 v4, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon E5-1620 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,338 vs 7,359).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,166 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 4300U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌833.3% higher power demand at 140W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 4300U better than Xeon E5-1620 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-1620 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 4300U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 4300U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 4300U is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-1620 v4 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 3 4300U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,166 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-1620 v4 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 23.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-1620 v4 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 4300U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 3 4300U vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 4300U

The Ryzen 3 4300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,359 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-1620 v4

The Xeon E5-1620 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 7,338 points. Launch price was $294.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 4300U packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E5-1620 v4's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 4300U versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-1620 v4 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-1620 v4 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 3 4300U uses the Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-1620 v4 uses Broadwell-EP (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 4300U scores 7,359 against the Xeon E5-1620 v4's 7,338 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 3 4300U. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 4300U vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1620 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 3 4300U	Xeon E5-1620 v4
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	3.8 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	3.5 GHz+30%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	10 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021)	Broadwell-EP (2016)
PassMark	7,359	7,338

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 4300U uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1620 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.