Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U
VS
Atom C3808

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U vs Atom C3808

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

4 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Atom C3808

12 Cores12 Thrd25 WWMax: 2 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3808

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
14472%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2733%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2428%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1875%
#428
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9879.97
100%
#429
EPYC 7552
MSRP: $4025|Avg: $1650
99%
#431
Xeon Platinum 8360Y
MSRP: $5383|Avg: N/A
99%
#432
Xeon W-3245
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1200
98%
#433
Xeon Gold 6346
MSRP: $2708|Avg: $2195
97%
#434
Xeon W-3225
MSRP: $1319|Avg: $850
96%
#736
Xeon E3-1245 v3
MSRP: $490|Avg: $490
100%
#737
Atom C3808
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#746
Xeon E5-2403 v2
MSRP: $192|Avg: $61
97%
#747
Xeon E3-1285 v4
MSRP: $556|Avg: $200
97%
#749
Xeon E3-1260L
MSRP: $294|Avg: $270
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U leads in gaming performance. However, the Atom C3808 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightRyzen 3 PRO 2300UAtom C3808
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raven Ridge (2017−2019) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen 3 PRO 2300UAtom C3808
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U and Atom C3808

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

The Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,639 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Atom C3808

The Atom C3808 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2133. Passmark benchmark score: 5,671 points. Launch price was $369.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom C3808 offers 12 cores / 12 threads — the Atom C3808 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U versus 2 GHz on the Atom C3808 — a 51.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U (base: 2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U uses the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Atom C3808 uses Goldmont (2016−2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U scores 5,639 against the Atom C3808's 5,671 — a 0.6% lead for the Atom C3808. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U vs 12 MB on the Atom C3808.

FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 2300UAtom C3808
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
12 / 12+200%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+70%
2 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
2 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
12 MB+200%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
12 MB+2300%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
Goldmont (2016−2017)
PassMark
5,639
5,671
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom C3808 uses FCBGA1310 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 2300UAtom C3808
Socket
FP5
FCBGA1310
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12