Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G vs Xeon E5-2640 v3

Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G vs Xeon E5-2640 v3 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G

4 / 8

10,942

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2640 v3

8 / 16

11,055

+1.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G vs Xeon E5-2640 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G vs Xeon E5-2640 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $790 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $939 MSRP).
✅Delivers 523.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.4 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $939 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 90W, a 25W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 6, while Xeon E5-2640 v3 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2640 v3.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (10,942 vs 11,055).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2640 v3, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2640 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅+400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 73.4 PassMark/$ ($939 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌38.5% higher power demand at 90W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G better than Xeon E5-2640 v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2640 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2640 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is the better buy right now. Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G comes in $790 cheaper on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $939 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2640 v3 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1% better PassMark. It is also 523.8% better value on MSRP (73.4 vs 11.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G vs Xeon E5-2640 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G

The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 10,942 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2640 v3

The Xeon E5-2640 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 11,055 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2640 v3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2640 v3 — a 16.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G scores 10,942 against the Xeon E5-2640 v3's 11,055 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E5-2640 v3. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2640 v3.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G	Xeon E5-2640 v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+18%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+46%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	20 MB (total)+400%
L2 Cache	2 MB	256K (per core)+12700%
Process	7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Renoir (2020−2023)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	10,942	11,055+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	5,995	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,516	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,334	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G versus DDR4-1866 on the Xeon E5-2640 v3 — the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G supports 71.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2640 v3 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2640 v3). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2640 v3) — the Xeon E5-2640 v3 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,A520,B550,X570 (Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G) and Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2640 v3).

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G	Xeon E5-2640 v3
Socket	AM4	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200+71%	DDR4-1866
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	768 GB+500%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	40+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon E5-2640 v3 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2640 v3). The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 6), while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E5-2640 v3 targets Server.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G	Xeon E5-2640 v3
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon Vega 6	—
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	Yes	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G was priced at $149, while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 came in at $939. On launch pricing ($149 vs $939), Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G was $790 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G delivers 73.4 pts/$ vs 11.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2640 v3 — making the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G the 144.7% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G	Xeon E5-2640 v3
MSRP	$149-84%	$939
Performance per Dollar	73.4+522%	11.8
Release Date	2020	2014

Search Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2640 v3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.