Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE vs Xeon E5-2690 v4

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE vs Xeon E5-2690 v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE

4 / 8

18,945

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2690 v4

14 / 28

19,255

+1.6%

Core i7-6800K

Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE vs Xeon E5-2690 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE vs Xeon E5-2690 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 135W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2690 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (18,945 vs 19,255).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2690 v4, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2690 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +30.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $2,090 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌285.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2690 v4 better than Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2690 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2690 v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 30.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2690 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2690 v4 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2690 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $2,090 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 30.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2016) and a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE vs Xeon E5-2690 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE

The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE is manufactured by AMD. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,945 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2690 v4

The Xeon E5-2690 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 19,255 points. Launch price was $2,090.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2690 v4 is built on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE scores 18,945 against the Xeon E5-2690 v4's 19,255 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2690 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE	Xeon E5-2690 v4
Cores / Threads	—	14 / 28
Boost Clock	—	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	—	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	—	35 MB
L2 Cache	—	3.5 MB
Process	—	14 nm
Architecture	—	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	18,945	19,255+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2690 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE	Xeon E5-2690 v4
Socket	AM5	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	—	1536 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE was priced at $0, while the Xeon E5-2690 v4 came in at $2090. On launch pricing ($0 vs $2090), Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE was $2090 cheaper.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE	Xeon E5-2690 v4
MSRP	$0-100%	$2090
Performance per Dollar	—	9.2
Release Date	2024	2016

Search Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2690 v4 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.