
Ryzen 5 3500X

Xeon Silver 4114
Ryzen 5 3500X vs Xeon Silver 4114 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 3500X vs Xeon Silver 4114 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 3500X vs Xeon Silver 4114: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 3500X
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+132.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 14 MB).
- ✅Costs $457 less on MSRP ($155 MSRP vs $612 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 296.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.9 vs 21.4 PassMark/$ ($155 MSRP vs $612 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 85W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4114 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4114, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Silver 4114
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,097 vs 13,165).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (14 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.4 vs 84.9 PassMark/$ ($612 MSRP vs $155 MSRP).
- ❌30.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3500X better than Xeon Silver 4114?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 3500X vs Xeon Silver 4114 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 3500X
The Ryzen 5 3500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 13,165 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon Silver 4114
The Xeon Silver 4114 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 13.75 MB. L2 cache: 10 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 13,097 points. Launch price was $694.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3500X packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4114 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon Silver 4114 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3500X versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4114 — a 31% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3500X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3500X uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4114 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3500X scores 13,165 against the Xeon Silver 4114's 13,097 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 3500X. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3500X vs 13.75 MB on the Xeon Silver 4114.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3500X | Xeon Silver 4114 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6 | 10 / 20+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+37% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+64% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+133% | 13.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+5020% | 10 MB |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 13,165 | 13,097 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3500X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4114 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3500X versus DDR4-2400 on the Xeon Silver 4114 — the Ryzen 5 3500X supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Silver 4114 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 3500X) vs 6 (Xeon Silver 4114). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 3500X) vs 48 (Xeon Silver 4114) — the Xeon Silver 4114 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series (Ryzen 5 3500X) and Intel C621 (Xeon Silver 4114).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3500X | Xeon Silver 4114 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+33% | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 768 GB+500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 48+100% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 5 3500X was priced at $155, while the Xeon Silver 4114 came in at $612. On launch pricing ($155 vs $612), Ryzen 5 3500X was $457 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3500X delivers 84.9 pts/$ vs 21.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Silver 4114 — making the Ryzen 5 3500X the 119.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3500X | Xeon Silver 4114 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $155-75% | $612 |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.9+297% | 21.4 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














