
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.1% higher average FPS across 35 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 63.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 54.2 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
2017Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 35 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,875 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 54.2 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($219 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.1% higher average FPS across 35 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 63.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 54.2 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 35 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,875 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 54.2 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($219 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Ryzen 5 PRO 1600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 79 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 189 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 297 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 5 PRO 1600


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.


Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
The Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 11,875 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600's 11,875 — a 39.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+17% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+12% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 17,685+49% | 11,875 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 4.0.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 1600). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 3600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 debuted at $219. On MSRP ($199 vs $219), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $20 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 54.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 48.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-9% | $219 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.9+64% | 54.2 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













