
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 2700E
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 99.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 44.6 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Ryzen 7 2700E
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,657 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.6 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Ryzen 7 2700E
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 99.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 44.6 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,657 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.6 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Ryzen 7 2700E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 264 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 232 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 129 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 366 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 366 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 366 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 366 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 366 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 366 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 366 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 366 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 366 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 326 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 7 2700E


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.


Ryzen 7 2700E
Ryzen 7 2700E
The Ryzen 7 2700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,657 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 2700E offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 2700E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 2700E — a 4.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 2700E uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Ryzen 7 2700E's 14,657 — a 18.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 2700E.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+5% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+29% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-42% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 17,685+21% | 14,657 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 4.0.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Ryzen 7 2700E). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 3600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 2700E debuted at $329. On MSRP ($199 vs $329), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $130 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 44.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 2700E — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 66.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-40% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.9+99% | 44.6 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












