
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 2700U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +154.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 2700U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 2700U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Ryzen 7 2700U
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,850 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Ryzen 7 2700U
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +154.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 2700U.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 2700U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,850 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Ryzen 7 2700U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 40 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 171 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 171 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 7 2700U


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.


Ryzen 7 2700U
Ryzen 7 2700U
The Ryzen 7 2700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 26 October 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,850 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 2700U offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen 7 2700U — a 10% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 2700U uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Ryzen 7 2700U's 6,850 — a 88.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 2700U.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+11% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+64% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+700% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Raven Ridge (2017−2019) |
| PassMark | 17,685+158% | 6,850 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 2700U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Ryzen 7 2700U). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 2700U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













