
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 127.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 39.0 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
2017Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,570 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.0 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 127.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 39.0 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,570 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.0 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 289 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 125 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 389 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 389 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 389 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 389 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 389 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 320 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 364 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 214 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 389 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 389 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 389 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 389 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 389 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 389 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 389 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 389 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 323 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.


Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 15,570 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X — a 10% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X's 15,570 — a 12.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+11% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+6% | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 17,685+14% | 15,570 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 24 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation, Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 3600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X debuted at $399. On MSRP ($199 vs $399), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $200 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 39.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 78% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-50% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.9+128% | 39.0 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













