Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U

AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2018

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +74.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U

2018

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (6,978 vs 17,685).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 32 MB).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U?
Yes. Ryzen 5 3600 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 74.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 153.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 3600 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 74.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 3600 is the better fit. You are getting 153.4% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 3600 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 5 3600 is at an unclear MSRP at $199 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 74.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 3600 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018), 700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 5 3600Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U
1080p
low200 FPS161 FPS
medium161 FPS139 FPS
high135 FPS111 FPS
ultra106 FPS89 FPS
1440p
low154 FPS137 FPS
medium119 FPS116 FPS
high96 FPS91 FPS
ultra75 FPS73 FPS
4K
low70 FPS62 FPS
medium58 FPS56 FPS
high46 FPS44 FPS
ultra36 FPS35 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 5 3600Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U
1080p
low442 FPS113 FPS
medium404 FPS99 FPS
high332 FPS93 FPS
ultra295 FPS74 FPS
1440p
low420 FPS96 FPS
medium359 FPS84 FPS
high303 FPS79 FPS
ultra263 FPS66 FPS
4K
low297 FPS72 FPS
medium259 FPS65 FPS
high230 FPS54 FPS
ultra201 FPS40 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 5 3600Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U
1080p
low442 FPS174 FPS
medium442 FPS174 FPS
high442 FPS174 FPS
ultra442 FPS174 FPS
1440p
low442 FPS174 FPS
medium442 FPS174 FPS
high442 FPS174 FPS
ultra432 FPS174 FPS
4K
low442 FPS174 FPS
medium361 FPS174 FPS
high305 FPS174 FPS
ultra242 FPS174 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 5 3600Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U
1080p
low442 FPS174 FPS
medium442 FPS174 FPS
high442 FPS174 FPS
ultra442 FPS174 FPS
1440p
low442 FPS174 FPS
medium442 FPS174 FPS
high442 FPS174 FPS
ultra442 FPS174 FPS
4K
low442 FPS174 FPS
medium442 FPS174 FPS
high413 FPS174 FPS
ultra357 FPS174 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U

AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,978 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U — a 10% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U's 6,978 — a 86.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U.

FeatureRyzen 5 3600Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U
Cores / Threads
6 / 12+50%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz+11%
3.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+64%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+700%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512 kB (per core)
Process
7 nm, 12 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Matisse (2019−2020)
Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
PassMark
17,685+153%
6,978
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,295
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 3600Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U
Socket
AM4
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

FeatureRyzen 5 3600Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
Target Use
Gaming/Budget Workstation