
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅+3.2% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 72.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 51.5 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,255 vs 1,295).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.5 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
2018Why buy it
- ✅+3.2% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 72.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 51.5 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,255 vs 1,295).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.5 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 170 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 340 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 391 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 228 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 359 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.


Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,959 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X — a 2.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X's 16,959 — a 4.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 9,500 vs 9,500 (0% advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,295 vs 1,255, a 3.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,898 vs 6,243 (106.7% advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+2% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-42% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 17,685+4% | 16,959 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295+3% | 1,255 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | 6,243+229% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600) and X470,B450,X370,B350,A320 (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+20% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation, Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 3600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X debuted at $329. On MSRP ($199 vs $329), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $130 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 51.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 53.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-40% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.9+73% | 51.5 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












