
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Costs $110 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 35.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 65.5 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 12,814).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 65.5 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($309 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
2020Why buy it
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Costs $110 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 35.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 65.5 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 12,814).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 65.5 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($309 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G better than Ryzen 5 3600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 381 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 243 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 330 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 506 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 468 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 408 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 439 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 374 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 331 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 266 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 506 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 506 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 429 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 368 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.


Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,227 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G's 20,227 — a 13.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 9,500 vs 12,814 (29.7% advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,295 vs 1,627, a 22.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,898 vs 7,556 (119.7% advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 8 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+300% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 17,685 | 20,227+14% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | 12,814+35% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | 1,627+26% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | 7,556+298% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 16 (Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600) and Socket AM4 (Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+50% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G). The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Ryzen 5 3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 3600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G debuted at $309. On MSRP ($199 vs $309), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $110 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 65.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 30.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-36% | $309 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.9+36% | 65.5 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












