
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 5845.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 26,054).
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌50.8% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 5845.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 26,054).
Trade-offs
- ❌50.8% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 better than Ryzen 5 3600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 431 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 256 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 179 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 411 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 350 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 289 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 227 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 651 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 651 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 641 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 651 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 593 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 511 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 526 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 426 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 371 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 7 PRO 5845


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.


Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 26,054 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 — a 9.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845's 26,054 — a 38.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845. Both processors carry 32 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.6 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+6% | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 17,685 | 26,054+47% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 4.0.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 5845). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 3600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 debuted at $300. On MSRP ($199 vs $300), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $101 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 86.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 2.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-34% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.9+2% | 86.8 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












