
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 26,852).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.3% higher average FPS across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.3% higher average FPS across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 26,852).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS better than Ryzen 5 3600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 510 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 386 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 216 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 671 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 647 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 355 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 671 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 671 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 671 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 671 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 660 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.


Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 26,852 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS — a 19.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS's 26,852 — a 41.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 5.1 GHz+21% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 8 MB+1500% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 17,685 | 26,852+52% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP7/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












