
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 4900H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 4900H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 18,887).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 4900H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Ryzen 9 4900H
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Ryzen 9 4900H
2020Why buy it
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 4900H.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 18,887).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 4900H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 4900H better than Ryzen 5 3600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 9 4900H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 9 4900H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 244 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 185 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 9 4900H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 472 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 472 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 462 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 395 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 282 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 9 4900H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 472 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 472 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 455 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 327 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 9 4900H


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.


Ryzen 9 4900H
Ryzen 9 4900H
The Ryzen 9 4900H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,887 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 4900H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 4900H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 4900H — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 4900H (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 9 4900H uses Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Ryzen 9 4900H's 18,887 — a 6.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 4900H. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 4900H.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 9 4900H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+9% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+300% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) |
| PassMark | 17,685 | 18,887+7% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 4900H uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 9 4900H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Ryzen 9 4900H). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 9 4900H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













