PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 16,000).
❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS moves to FP7/FP8 and DDR5.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.6% higher average FPS across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

2023

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.6% higher average FPS across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 16,000).
❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS moves to FP7/FP8 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS better than Ryzen 5 3600?

Yes. Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 22.6% average FPS lead across 43 shared CPU game tests in our data, 68.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 54.5% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 22.6% more average FPS across 43 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is the better fit. You are getting 68.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 3600 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it gives you a 22.6% average FPS lead across 43 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 3600 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with FP7/FP8 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 3600 Benchmark Check

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 3600	Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
1080p
low	200 FPS	269 FPS
medium	161 FPS	243 FPS
high	135 FPS	204 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	176 FPS
1440p
low	154 FPS	236 FPS
medium	119 FPS	193 FPS
high	96 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	75 FPS	139 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	164 FPS
medium	58 FPS	136 FPS
high	46 FPS	105 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	92 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3600 Open Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 3600	Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
1080p
low	442 FPS	513 FPS
medium	404 FPS	421 FPS
high	332 FPS	363 FPS
ultra	295 FPS	323 FPS
1440p
low	420 FPS	448 FPS
medium	359 FPS	388 FPS
high	303 FPS	334 FPS
ultra	263 FPS	285 FPS
4K
low	297 FPS	295 FPS
medium	259 FPS	267 FPS
high	230 FPS	253 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	217 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3600 Open Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 3600	Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
1080p
low	442 FPS	683 FPS
medium	442 FPS	683 FPS
high	442 FPS	647 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	546 FPS
1440p
low	442 FPS	683 FPS
medium	442 FPS	637 FPS
high	442 FPS	541 FPS
ultra	432 FPS	464 FPS
4K
low	442 FPS	541 FPS
medium	361 FPS	473 FPS
high	305 FPS	419 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	355 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3600 Open Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 3600	Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
1080p
low	442 FPS	683 FPS
medium	442 FPS	683 FPS
high	442 FPS	683 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	683 FPS
1440p
low	442 FPS	683 FPS
medium	442 FPS	683 FPS
high	442 FPS	660 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	573 FPS
4K
low	442 FPS	572 FPS
medium	442 FPS	511 FPS
high	413 FPS	457 FPS
ultra	357 FPS	394 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3600 Open Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 27,318 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS — a 21.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS's 27,318 — a 42.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 9,500 vs 16,000 (51% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,295 vs 2,605, a 67.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,898 vs 10,348 (138% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz	5.2 GHz+24%
Base Clock	3.6 GHz	4 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+100%	16 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	8 MB+1500%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Matisse (2019−2020)	Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark	17,685	27,318+54%
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,500	16,000+68%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,295	2,605+101%
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,898	10,348+445%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS — the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600) and SoC (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS).

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Socket	AM4	FP7/FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-5600+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+100%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24+20%	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support Yes virtualization. The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Ryzen 5 3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.