
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Costs $301 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 35.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 65.7 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 32,841).
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 890M, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 65.7 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($500 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
2025Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Costs $301 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 35.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 65.7 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 890M, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 32,841).
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 65.7 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($500 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 better than Ryzen 5 3600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 84 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 182 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 159 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 121 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 813 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 641 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 559 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 463 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 712 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 491 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 412 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 314 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 821 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 821 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 751 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 682 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 796 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 715 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 615 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 547 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 390 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.


Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point-HX PRO (Zen 5/5c) (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,841 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 — a 19.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 uses Strix Point-HX PRO (Zen 5/5c) (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370's 32,841 — a 60% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 5.1 GHz+21% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+80% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Strix Point-HX PRO (Zen 5/5c) (2025) |
| PassMark | 17,685 | 32,841+86% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus LPDDR5X-8000 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 — the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 20 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | LPDDR5X-8000+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+20% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) vs AMD-V (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 890M), while the Ryzen 5 3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation, Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 targets Mobile Workstation / AI. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 890M |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | Yes | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | Mobile Workstation / AI |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 3600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 debuted at $500. On MSRP ($199 vs $500), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $301 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 65.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 30% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-60% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.9+35% | 65.7 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












