
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 22,246).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 890M, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
2025Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 890M, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 22,246).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 better than Ryzen 5 3600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 115 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 738 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 429 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 661 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 533 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 359 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 301 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 840 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 809 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 694 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 625 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 757 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 680 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 583 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 515 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 369 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.


Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,619 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 — a 19.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses Strix Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375's 33,619 — a 62.1% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 9,500 vs 22,246 (80.3% advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,295 vs 2,864, a 75.5% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,898 vs 15,012 (155.1% advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 5.1 GHz+21% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+80% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Strix Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 17,685 | 33,619+90% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | 22,246+134% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | 2,864+121% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | 15,012+691% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus LPDDR5x-8000 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 — the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600) and FP8,FP7 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | LPDDR5x-8000+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+50% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) vs AMD-V, IOMMU (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 890M), while the Ryzen 5 3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation, Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 targets Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400; Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 rivals Core i9-14900HX.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 890M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | Yes | AMD-V, IOMMU |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 3600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($199 vs $0), the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is $199 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.9 | — |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












