
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Ryzen Embedded R1606G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +262.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Embedded R1606G.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded R1606G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Ryzen Embedded R1606G
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,162 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Ryzen Embedded R1606G
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +262.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Embedded R1606G.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded R1606G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,162 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Ryzen Embedded R1606G?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen Embedded R1606G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen Embedded R1606G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 24 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen Embedded R1606G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 104 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen Embedded R1606G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 104 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen Embedded R1606G


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.


Ryzen Embedded R1606G
Ryzen Embedded R1606G
The Ryzen Embedded R1606G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,162 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R1606G offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1606G — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R1606G uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Ryzen Embedded R1606G's 4,162 — a 123.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R1606G.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen Embedded R1606G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+200% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+20% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+38% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+700% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 17,685+325% | 4,162 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1606G uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen Embedded R1606G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded R1606G). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen Embedded R1606G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 3600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Ryzen Embedded R1606G debuted at $0. On MSRP ($199 vs $0), the Ryzen Embedded R1606G is $199 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen Embedded R1606G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.9 | — |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













