Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,296 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 195.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 53,977).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +47.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.1 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($2,495 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX better than Ryzen 5 3600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 74,985 points. Launch price was $3,299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX — a 6.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX's 74,985 — a 123.7% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 9,500 vs 53,977 (140.1% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,295 vs 1,686, a 26.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,898 vs 29,745 (176% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 32 / 64+433% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.5 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 128 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 17,685 | 74,985+324% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | 53,977+468% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | 1,686+30% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | 29,745+1467% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2048 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX rivals Xeon Gold 6338.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | true |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 5 3600 was priced at $199, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX came in at $2495. On launch pricing ($199 vs $2495), Ryzen 5 3600 was $2296 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 30.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 98.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-92% | $2495 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.9+195% | 30.1 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
