
Ryzen 5 3600

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,200 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 149.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 35.6 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 49,756).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.6 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($1,399 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX better than Ryzen 5 3600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 49,756 points. Launch price was $1,399.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX — a 23.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX's 49,756 — a 95.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 5.3 GHz+26% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4.7 GHz+31% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+51100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 17,685 | 49,756+181% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 5200+63% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2048 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX rivals Xeon w5-3435X.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 5 3600 was priced at $199, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX came in at $1399. On launch pricing ($199 vs $1399), Ryzen 5 3600 was $1200 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 35.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 85.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-86% | $1399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.9+150% | 35.6 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














