PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $7,800 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $7,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 360.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 19.3 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $7,999 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 120,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +35.8% higher average FPS across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.3 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($7,999 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $7,800 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $7,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 360.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 19.3 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $7,999 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +35.8% higher average FPS across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 120,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.3 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($7,999 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX better than Ryzen 5 3600?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 3600 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 35.8% more average FPS across 39 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 256 MB vs 32 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is the better fit. You are getting 1163.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 3600 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is 3919.6% more expensive on MSRP at $7,999 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it gives you a 35.8% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 3600 is also 360.5% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 19.3 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019), a healthier platform with sTR5 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 256 MB L3 cache instead of 32 MB, more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 6/12, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 3600 Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 3600	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
1080p
low	200 FPS	303 FPS
medium	161 FPS	281 FPS
high	135 FPS	231 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	195 FPS
1440p
low	154 FPS	268 FPS
medium	119 FPS	224 FPS
high	96 FPS	172 FPS
ultra	75 FPS	152 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	186 FPS
medium	58 FPS	155 FPS
high	46 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	105 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3600 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 3600	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
1080p
low	442 FPS	803 FPS
medium	404 FPS	687 FPS
high	332 FPS	538 FPS
ultra	295 FPS	468 FPS
1440p
low	420 FPS	662 FPS
medium	359 FPS	590 FPS
high	303 FPS	477 FPS
ultra	263 FPS	386 FPS
4K
low	297 FPS	370 FPS
medium	259 FPS	334 FPS
high	230 FPS	308 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	269 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3600 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 3600	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
1080p
low	442 FPS	889 FPS
medium	442 FPS	728 FPS
high	442 FPS	654 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	556 FPS
1440p
low	442 FPS	693 FPS
medium	442 FPS	567 FPS
high	442 FPS	498 FPS
ultra	432 FPS	419 FPS
4K
low	442 FPS	490 FPS
medium	361 FPS	407 FPS
high	305 FPS	365 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	303 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3600 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 3600	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
1080p
low	442 FPS	1131 FPS
medium	442 FPS	1014 FPS
high	442 FPS	889 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	802 FPS
1440p
low	442 FPS	890 FPS
medium	442 FPS	783 FPS
high	442 FPS	688 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	599 FPS
4K
low	442 FPS	649 FPS
medium	442 FPS	579 FPS
high	413 FPS	514 FPS
ultra	357 FPS	437 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3600 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 154,361 points. Launch price was $7,999.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX has 58 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX — a 25% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX's 154,361 — a 158.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 9,500 vs 120,000 (170.7% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,295 vs 3,644, a 95.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,898 vs 37,967 (181% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 256 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX.

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	64 / 128+967%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz	5.4 GHz+29%
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+12%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	256 MB (total)+700%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Matisse (2019−2020)	Shimada Peak (2025)
PassMark	17,685	154,361+773%
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,500	120,000+1163%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,295	3,644+181%
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,898	37,967+1900%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX).

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
Socket	AM4	sTR5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-6400+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	2048 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	128+433%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX rivals Xeon w9-3475X.

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	Yes	true
Target Use	Gaming/Budget Workstation	High-end Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 5 3600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX debuted at $7999. On MSRP ($199 vs $7999), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $7800 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 19.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 128.6% better value option.