
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

U300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +47.5% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike U300.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while U300 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while U300 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
U300
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,492 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019U300
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +47.5% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike U300.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while U300 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while U300 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,492 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than U300?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | U300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | U300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 128 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | U300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 168 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | U300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 212 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and U300


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

U300
U300
The U300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 5 cores and 6 threads. Max frequency: 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 8,492 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the U300 offers 5 cores / 6 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 4.4 GHz on the U300 — a 4.7% clock advantage for the U300. The Ryzen 5 3600 is built on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the U300's 8,492 — a 70.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the U300.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | U300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+20% | 5 / 6 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+300% | 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | — |
| PassMark | 17,685+108% | 8,492 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the U300 uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | U300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA1744 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (U300). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | U300 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












