Ryzen 5 3600 vs VIA Nano X2 U4025

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 3600 vs VIA Nano X2 U4025 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 3600 vs VIA Nano X2 U4025: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +827.2% higher average FPS across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike VIA Nano X2 U4025.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while VIA Nano X2 U4025 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌400% higher power demand at 65W vs 13W.

VIA Nano X2 U4025

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 13W instead of 65W, a 52W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (885 vs 17,685).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than VIA Nano X2 U4025?

Yes. Ryzen 5 3600 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 827.2% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1898.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 3600 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 827.2% more average FPS across 44 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 3600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1898.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 3600 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 3600 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $199 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 827.2% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 3600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 5 3600 vs VIA Nano X2 U4025 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

VIA Nano X2 U4025

The VIA Nano X2 U4025 is manufactured by TSMC. It was released in Janeiro 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the CNC (2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: NanoBGA2. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 885 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the VIA Nano X2 U4025 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 1.2 GHz on the VIA Nano X2 U4025 — a 111.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600. The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the VIA Nano X2 U4025 uses CNC (2011) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the VIA Nano X2 U4025's 885 — a 180.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	VIA Nano X2 U4025
Cores / Threads	6 / 12+200%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+250%	1.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 12 nm-83%	40 nm
Architecture	Matisse (2019−2020)	CNC (2011)
PassMark	17,685+1898%	885
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,295	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,898	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the VIA Nano X2 U4025 uses NanoBGA2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	VIA Nano X2 U4025
Socket	AM4	NanoBGA2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+100%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	24	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (VIA Nano X2 U4025). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.