
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Xeon 6349P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon 6349P.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6349P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 25,953).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon 6349P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6349P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Xeon 6349P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Xeon 6349P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon 6349P.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6349P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 25,953).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon 6349P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6349P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6349P better than Ryzen 5 3600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon 6349P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 96 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon 6349P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 528 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 451 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 331 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 227 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon 6349P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 649 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 649 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 583 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 649 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 560 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 517 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 462 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 337 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon 6349P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 649 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 649 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 649 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 649 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 639 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 548 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 557 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 495 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 369 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon 6349P


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon 6349P
Xeon 6349P
The Xeon 6349P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 25,953 points. Launch price was $509.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon 6349P share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 5.4 GHz on the Xeon 6349P — a 25% clock advantage for the Xeon 6349P (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon 6349P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon 6349P's 25,953 — a 37.9% lead for the Xeon 6349P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon 6349P.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon 6349P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 5.4 GHz+29% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+78% | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 17,685 | 25,953+47% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6349P uses LGA1700 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon 6349P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Xeon 6349P). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon 6349P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












